By communally reenacting Gods story, through the liturgy, the church shapes itself by its shared common story. Barry Harvey points out the difference that we must be re-telling a story and not telling it differently.4 This isn’t the case of us modifying how God has enacted, it is the church learning to place itself in both the past, present and future orientation of how God works through the sacraments. It is through these gifts of grace and mercy that we join with the saints and with God. It is hard to talk about someone you don’t know or understand, but by coming to the table we stand face to face with the saints that have come before us. We enact the story in different manners, but it always comes back to a celebration and remembrance of all that God has done for us. Robert Jenson describes the Eucharist being an “enclosed world”5, the church acting as exactly what it believes it is. This belief lies in the idea of a Christian timeline that starts with Gods creation and ends in Eschaton. In the middle of this, God himself broke into the world as human without decreasing his divinity. The church shows how it’s narrative, enacted in Eucharistic celebration, names the writer of the worlds actual narrative. This enclosed world is not fictitious and neither is it fanciful or dreamlike. Through our union with the Holy Spirit we believe it to be a true, enacted viewpoint of how the world operates.
In order for our liturgy to not be seen as this fanciful thing, the church must embody what it remembers in anamnesis. We can’t assume that the people in our communities already know their background. The story must be told over and over, not for the sake of being rote, but instead to ingrain itself as a living part of Christian society. The church must fix the accusation of its failure to be relevant and hypocritical by actually serving as “the event” to which we believe.6 The Gospel must be on our faces, in our words and most evident in our actions.
One might fear that this is simply creating a new post-modern Christian narrative that answers the questions that the last 50 years of Evangelicalism have caused. Understanding the Eucharist and it’s formational attributes isn’t creation, but is is a return to how the church found itself for hundreds of years. They are the involvement in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit’s life together. The Sacraments are a reaction to selfishness and the individual self is “reconstituted through liturgical worship”.7 It is an invitation to participate in what has been going on since the beginning of time and will continue to be going on for all eternity.
Where emptiness exists, Christ is. It is the task of the church now is to bring people into the home where this restoration can take place. The Body and Blood of Jesus Christ are the repair of this chasm within the person, and function as the place in which we all come to God.
+++++++
4. Harvey, Barry A. 1999. Another City: An Ecclesiological Primer for a Post-Christian World. 1st ed. Trinity Press International, May 1.19
5 Jenson pg.143
6. Jenson pg.147
7. Fitch, David E. 2005. The Great Giveaway: Reclaiming the Mission of the Church from Big Business, Parachurch Organizations, Psychotherapy, Consumer Capitalism, and Other Modern Maladies. annotated edition. Baker Books, November 1. pg. 107

Recent Comments