I have used the phrase "secular apocalypse" before, and I wanted to take a moment to explain it better. It doesn't have a simple definition, but is more of a cultural phenomenon that I think is a result of Protestantisms engagement with the modern world. In the drastic social changes over the last 100 years, the church has had to develop some interesting ways to deal with a truly secular Western world.
This article on scientists and fundamentalists (from Huffington Post correspondent Clay Farris Naff) explains how both scientists and fundamentalist Christians are both agreeing in an immanent violent event that will change the face of Earth. A few excerpts:
Many of the best-informed scientists agree that we have left it too late to prevent anthropogenic climate change from bringing on a global catastrophe. Whether this results in actual extinction or merely the ruin of civilization is a matter they are still debating.
Fundies entertain no such doubts. Preacher Tim LaHaye and his potboiler
copilot Jerry Jenkins have made a vast fortune describing the gory
biblical end they gleefully anticipate. Their Left Behind
novels have been bestsellers, but don't get the idea they think this is
mere fiction. In a recent Fox News interview with Governor (and former
Republican presidential candidate) Mike Huckabee, LaHaye says the End
Times are due to start, and that President Obama's "socialism" is
speeding the day....
Evangelical doomsayers, on the other hand, say "bring it on." They are
elated by the thought that they will be snatched up to heaven while all
those godless liberals and assorted heathens suffer torment below. They
even welcome climate change as part of "God's plan." Check out the
scorching sun and 100-pound hailstones in this slick video:
While the article is heavy on a specific Christian view, and light on science, it does show the view of how Christians have begun to handle what the Earth is, where they are in response to it's location of "heaven", and how they feel about those who are not part of the club...
Part of the secular movement was the idea that the world was created by chance...and we are not on a decided timeline, but one that is motivated and guided by situations that are perfectly unpredictable (such as evolution theory and the idea of a natural cataclysmic event). The evangelical movement took up a baptized version of this story, and clung to apocalyptic stories of escape and destruction.
When the world puts itself on a timeline, but has no shape or form to the story, we will end up making up our own stories regarding beginning and end (Robert Jenson's article How the World Lost It's Story is key..go read it). If the world started by chance...then it must end by chance. Apocalyptiscism, as presented by Hollywood, is our culture making its own timeline, reacting against the idea that humans could make everything perfect themselves. Our pendulum has swung to the opposite side of early 20th century liberalism, with the exact opposite of a positive outlook on the place God called "good". When a finality is created apart from the idea of salvation and worship, we have a pretty bad fracture. As Christians, especially those branded evangelicals, we offer a poor response to the false narrative of secularism. We care about escape and not renewal by the power of the cross.
This doesn't mean that we neglect the idea of judgment-we know it must happen, but we counter their story with one that does have a distinct beginning and end. Instead of making the chance apocalyptic event the "Rapture", we offer a message filled to the brim with the desire and necessity of a final event that places those in right relationship with the Father (through a recognition of the lordship of Christ and an identification within him) as inheritors of the promised blessing (Rev 21:6). We quit trying to escape this world (the whole idea of an "evil" world is very gnostic and not Christian at all), and instead realize that the promised idea of a New Earth is God fixing the unbalances that are the result of humans denial of Him in the garden. When we give the message of "bring it on", we are telling the world that we simply quit caring for them.
Often enough, the Kingdom that the church supposedly believes in does not offer a strong enough contrast to secular society (instead functions as Christianism within it). Our lives are filled with a hope for the future, and this hope should be drawing us to both care for others and live explicit gospel lives in our actions towards them. Jesus is our hope, and we should very direct with our intentions.
In a postmodern structure, the secular story is one of individualism and chance. The Body of Christ offers a true alternative communion through the Holy Spirit into the nature of Christs offering to the Father on the Cross and the knowledge that God has a plan for this world...and it has been unfolding through the vehicle of grace since the beginning.
related posts:
Christians and Postmodernity
Glory be to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit;
As it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be